I’ve dished out no punishment, nor have I received any.

Enlightened language is favored here.

Crass and profane language is not welcomed.

Peace unto you.

When some of the Muslims did some nasty crap to me and / or my former Community, I really got “nasty” with them telling about their crooked selves directly without hesitation. My former Imam got it real bad when he did those bad things and I’ve decided to leave because I was more than ready to hurt that man or worse! I only use profanity when I’m in a state of disgust, Anger, indignant and being provoked unjustly. One thing more, I didn’t curse these men in the first place. I only rebuked them in the strongest manner.

S. Saddiq, Ph.D

“Allah alone is the Grantor of respite. It is His power only. Iblis requested respite from Allah to prove his worthiness to rule. Even though Iblis said: ‘Lord, the power to grant respite is Yours alone’.I know it is Allah’s power alone to grant that respite to Iblis. I know this”.

“But I still curse his ass”

Greetings Dr Saddiq:

Fine. You caught me cursing the accursed one. I don’t consider the language I used in cursing shaytan equivalent to profane language you used to disagree with your muslim brothers.

You have carte blanche to curse shaytan on this site, but you will not be allowed to curse your muslim brothers.

That is a moral judgement on my part and I stand by it.

nashid

“Allah alone is the Grantor of respite. It is His power only. Iblis requested respite from Allah to prove his worthiness to rule. Even though Iblis said: ‘Lord, the power to grant respite is Yours alone’.I know it is Allah’s power alone to grant that respite to Iblis. I know this”.

“But I still curse his ass”.

What?! These are your own words that you’ve composed in your reply and it would be crazy for you to deny them and the integrity of yours won’t hold much value with those who are observing the replies between myself and you if you choose to do so. If you want to look at vulgarity real close at work, you go ahead and look into Imam Saahir’s reply to Min. Farrakhan’s interview plus other Imams’ views which they are of that ilk including the rank and file Muslims who follow suit the same way. It’s quite interesting that some of the Supporters of Imam W.D. Mohammed were then / still are being abused by other Muslims and now they’ve become the Abusers of others. “Do you command righteouness upon the People but you neglect it yourselves…..do you not have any understanding”? Qur’aaan Ch.2 : V. 44

It’s probably true that you be one of the Moderators of this Site or you be the only one doing this job here. And now you’re dictating to me about “Well reasoned, scholarly language is required before your comments be approved for sharing here”. What I’ve witnessed and observed 14 years of my Muslim life, I’ve seen a lot of abuse going on by some of the Imams putting on their Followers and they claimed that they’re Followers of Imam Mohammed. There was one Imam that I didn’t get along with and we nearly had a dogfight that we were going to do each other harm but God has prevented that from occuring. My former Imam who was taught by Imam Mohammed, he happened to be a Fake and a Fraud so I’ve left him. Another Imam who happened to be so arrrogant that he has abused other Muslim communities who are Imam Mohammed’s Supporters who don’t kowtow to his behind. Last year, he got kicked out of his position becuse he was abusive. The three men I’ve mentioned claimed to be Supporters of Imam Mohammed.

As for my first post that you’ve edited, I had replied to your with my second one asking you that were my statements are true and exact and you haven’t answered them. However, I’m going to ask you this question here. Does my comment that I’ve posted up now have the truth and clarity that you’re going to acknowledge on how real it is or you’re going to alter it or discard it because it’s too strong? Regardless if you agree or not, I’ve made the strong impact on this reply board in the shortest time aloowed by God’s decree.

S.S. Saddiq, Ph.D

Your Islamically sound positions on whatever issues you present are welcomed here.

There is no requirement that your comments have to agree with anything posted on this blog, but in your case, well reasoned, scholarly language is required before your comments will be approved for sharing here.

If the benefit from your Ph.D status to be shared with us is vulgar hyperbole, then:

Thanks, but not thanks.

nashid

1. The Addressor’s choice of words to convey the message.

OR……………….

2. The very real life issues that I’ve talked about are so graphic and vulgar that are going on now that they’re more repugnant than what the Addressor has stated.

Now the time has come for you to choose one or the other because things are real on the battlefield and I refuse to play games and be involved with the filth. Furthermore, I do believe that my words are so real that the ones who feel of what I’ve stated are offensive could be the very ones got hurt by my words for the reasons that they might be the individuals involved with the mess that they’re guilty with. Oh, is this what it could be the reason that my message is hitting too close at home? Probably so by the way things are looking by my perspective and I make no apologies for what I’ve stated. As for you questioning my Ph.D status, I honestly don’t care for the reason that I’ve seen a lot of Muslim Scholars speaking on a lot of “safe matters” which put the masses to sleep and don’t want the people to wake up to be living human beings. So what I’m doing is focusing on my own scholarship that’s going to be unique, authentic and organic so it’ll be very helpful to all people. This is real and I’m sticking with it.

(edited by nashid – Brother Saddiq wrote much, much more. But the vulgarity of his language makes me question any benefit derived from his Ph.D status)

Samuel S. Saddiq, Ph.D. in Islamic Studies

Brother Khaled in his previous reply, makes an excellent point, at least in my opinion. How can NOI followers of Minister Farrakhan be credited for taking Al-Islam to the streets? I’m just referring to those NOI followers of Minister Farrakhan.

The Final Call newspaper clearly promotes shirk when it speaks about what its followers believe on the back page. False worship of G_D and the multiple distortions of Al-Islam being taken to the streets is not the basis for survival for any Student of Imam W.D. Mohammed (RA).

True unity for true muslims is “There is no g-d but Allah & Mohammed ibn Abdullah is His Apostle!

When a man/woman takes the Shahadah, Master Fard Mohammed nor the Honorable Elijah Muhammed deserve any credit because they both were human-beings created by Allah (swt)

Imam Saahir's comments are informed, direct, unapologetic, based on Qu'ran and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammed (PBUH), the expansive teachings and leadership of Imam W. D. Muhammed. Minister Farrakhan has remained two faced since 1975. We seek unity around truth, not lies, distortions, ego trips, delusions of grandeur, that so characterize so much of what Minster Farrakhan still promotes. As for the comment by the person that says Nation of Islam followers consistently take islam to the people in the street more so than the students of Imam W.D. Muhammed, you fail to realized that much of the teachings that those members of the Nation of Islam take to the street, are the same distortions, false god worship, lies that Minister Farrakhan continues to teach and print in the newspaper, The Final Call. "Minister Farrakhan, we have leadership, we don't need yours."
I respect the members of the Nation of Islam, but, I still think that most of them are being victimizing by corrupt so-called- leaders, who knowingly distort Islam for selfish purposes.

As-Salaam Alaikum

I hope the members of the Nation of Islam see or hear the things the members of this Muslim community are saying and the attitude displayed.

Minister Farrakhan has sincerely tried(publicly) particularly since 1998 to find some kind of operational unity with this community. However, that same love has not been shown back in many instances mainly from the followers and Imams. We are in a time where Muslim unity is a must at least for the basis of survival.

As you say you can question the Nation regarding its teachings, I believe the same can be required of you concerning the hypocrisy of the now former members of the NOI and the Messenger. You don’t have to deny the Messenger to acknowledge Prophet Muhammad(pbuh). I love the Messenger and I love the prophet with no conflict.

I leave you as I came praying for peace

Brother Mustafaa
http://brothermustafaa.com